Which three options are result of utilizing a fragmented security model? (Choose three)

Question

Options

• AIndividual components pieced together that are incompatible
• BMultiple points of access that can be exploited by cyber criminals
• CAdditional fragmentation that reduces the risk from malicious files
• DDecreased network accessibility through multiple applications
• EPatchworked applications that continually increase in complex
• FFragmented security that provides disbursed protection

• A
  73% (11)
• C
  13% (2)
• D
  7% (1)
• F
  7% (1)

Explanation

A fragmented security model-stitching together disparate, uncoordinated tools-produces incompatible components (A), multiple exploitable access points (B), and ever-growing patchwork complexity (E) because each added tool introduces integration gaps, new attack surfaces, and management overhead rather than cohesive protection. Option C is wrong because more fragmentation increases risk from malicious files, not reduces it. Option D is wrong because fragmentation typically widens network exposure rather than restricting accessibility. Option F is wrong because fragmented security creates gaps in coverage, not dispersed (broad) protection-it's the opposite of comprehensive defense.

Memory tip: Think of fragmented security like a patchwork quilt with holes - it's Incompatible pieces (A), leaves Breaches open (B), and becomes increasingly Entangled in complexity (E) - the three negatives that rhyme with the word "fragmented" itself: Incompatible, Breachable, Entangled.

No community discussion yet for this question.