70-663 · Question #47
You plan to deploy Exchange Server 2010 on your network. You plan to deploy the servers configured as shown in the following table. You need to recommend a solution to deploy Mailbox servers. The…
The correct answer is A. Deploy two Mailbox servers. Deploying two mailbox servers in a DAG with RAID 5 arrays is the most cost effective solution NLB is not supported with DAGs and 3-nodes will cost more money. So, the best solution is A. If you plan to deploy multi-role Exchange 2010 servers with both DAG protected mailbox…
Question
You plan to deploy Exchange Server 2010 on your network. You plan to deploy the servers configured as shown in the following table. You need to recommend a solution to deploy Mailbox servers. The solution must meet the following requirements:
- Maintain redundancy if a single disk fails
- Maintain redundancy if a single server fails
- Minimize hardware costs
What should you recommend?
Exhibit
Options
- ADeploy two Mailbox servers.
- BDeploy a two-node Network Load Balancing cluster.
- CDeploy a database availability group (DAG) that contains three members.
- DDeploy a three-node Network Load Balancing cluster.
How the community answered
(30 responses)- A73% (22)
- B7% (2)
- C17% (5)
- D3% (1)
Explanation
Deploying two mailbox servers in a DAG with RAID 5 arrays is the most cost effective solution NLB is not supported with DAGs and 3-nodes will cost more money. So, the best solution is A. If you plan to deploy multi-role Exchange 2010 servers with both DAG protected mailbox databases and load balanced/highly available CAS server service, you cannot use WNLB due to Windows Failover Cluster (WFC) and WNLB hardware sharing conflicts recovery/load-balancing-exchange-2010-client-access-servers-using-hardware-load-balancer- solution-part1.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.