4A0-107 · Question #66
Which of the following statements BEST describes an MBS parameter?
The correct answer is B. It specifies the maximum depth of a queue beyond which packets will be dropped. MBS (Maximum Buffer Size) defines the absolute ceiling on how deep a queue can grow - once the queue reaches this depth, any additional arriving packets are tail-dropped, making B correct. Why the distractors are wrong: A describes a scheduler or PIR (Peak Information Rate)…
Question
Which of the following statements BEST describes an MBS parameter?
Options
- AIt specifies the maximum rate at which a queue can be serviced.
- BIt specifies the maximum depth of a queue beyond which packets will be dropped.
- CIt specifies the portion of a queue that is taken from the reserved buffer pool.
- DIt specifies the threshold beyond which only in-profile packets will be queued.
- EIt specifies the peak bandwidth that can be attained by the incoming traffic.
How the community answered
(29 responses)- A3% (1)
- B93% (27)
- C3% (1)
Explanation
MBS (Maximum Buffer Size) defines the absolute ceiling on how deep a queue can grow - once the queue reaches this depth, any additional arriving packets are tail-dropped, making B correct.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A describes a scheduler or PIR (Peak Information Rate) concept, which controls service rate, not buffer depth.
- C describes the CBS (Committed Burst Size) parameter, which controls how much of the reserved buffer pool a queue can use before dipping into shared buffers.
- D describes a High Priority Only (HPO) threshold, where the queue accepts only high-priority (in-profile) traffic once that threshold is crossed.
- E describes PIR (Peak Information Rate), which caps the bandwidth of incoming or outgoing traffic, not the queue storage.
Memory tip: Think of MBS = Maximum Bucket Size - picture a physical bucket collecting water (packets); MBS is the rim of the bucket. Once water hits the rim, the overflow (excess packets) spills away and is dropped.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.