400-007 · Question #343
Enterprises that are embarking on their cloud migration journey must be able to have control over their workload mobility without platform interdependencies. What is an ecosystem consideration for…
The correct answer is C. cloud service provider offerings without lock-in. To maintain workload mobility and avoid platform interdependencies after cloud migration, enterprises must select cloud service provider offerings that do not impose vendor lock-in.
Question
Enterprises that are embarking on their cloud migration journey must be able to have control over their workload mobility without platform interdependencies. What is an ecosystem consideration for workload placement that helps the enterprise remain agile and independent post-cloud migration?
Options
- Abusiness continuity and disaster recovery
- Bproper integration with back-end systems
- Ccloud service provider offerings without lock-in
- Doverall TCO reduction
How the community answered
(65 responses)- A2% (1)
- B3% (2)
- C94% (61)
- D2% (1)
Why each option
To maintain workload mobility and avoid platform interdependencies after cloud migration, enterprises must select cloud service provider offerings that do not impose vendor lock-in.
Business continuity and disaster recovery address workload availability and failover resilience, not the platform interdependency or portability concerns that define the lock-in problem.
Proper integration with back-end systems is an interoperability concern focused on connecting existing infrastructure to cloud services, not on ensuring freedom to move workloads between cloud platforms.
Choosing cloud offerings without lock-in means prioritizing standards-based, portable services over proprietary APIs and platform-specific architectures that would tightly bind workloads to a single provider. This directly addresses the ecosystem consideration of workload placement because it ensures the enterprise can migrate workloads between providers or back on-premises without significant re-engineering, preserving the agility and independence that are the goal of avoiding lock-in.
Overall TCO reduction is a financial objective related to cost optimization and does not directly address platform independence or the technical ability to move workloads freely across providers.
Concept tested: Avoiding vendor lock-in in cloud workload placement
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/strategy/cloud-migration-business-case
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.