nerdexam
Cisco

400-007 · Question #161

Company XYZ, a global content provider, owns data centers on different continents. Their data center design involves a standard three-layer design with a Layer 3-only core. HSRP is used as the FHRP…

The correct answer is D. at the aggregation layer because it is the Layer 2 to Layer 3 demarcation point. In a three-layer design with a Layer 3-only core, the aggregation layer is the optimal termination point for a Layer 2 interconnection because it serves as the boundary between Layer 2 and Layer 3 domains.

Designing Network Infrastructure

Question

Company XYZ, a global content provider, owns data centers on different continents. Their data center design involves a standard three-layer design with a Layer 3-only core. HSRP is used as the FHRP. They require VLAN extension across access switches in all data centers, and they plan to purchase a Layer 2 interconnection between two of their data centers in Europe. In the absence of other business or technical constraints, which termination point is optimal for the layer 2 interconnection?

Options

  • Aat the access layer because the STP root bridge does not need to align with the HSRP active
  • Bat the core layer, to offer the possibility to isolate STP domains
  • Cat the core layer because all external connections must terminate there for security reasons
  • Dat the aggregation layer because it is the Layer 2 to Layer 3 demarcation point

How the community answered

(41 responses)
  • A
    10% (4)
  • B
    5% (2)
  • C
    15% (6)
  • D
    71% (29)

Why each option

In a three-layer design with a Layer 3-only core, the aggregation layer is the optimal termination point for a Layer 2 interconnection because it serves as the boundary between Layer 2 and Layer 3 domains.

Aat the access layer because the STP root bridge does not need to align with the HSRP active

Terminating at the access layer would extend STP domains unnecessarily deep into the network, increasing convergence complexity and failure blast radius rather than reducing it.

Bat the core layer, to offer the possibility to isolate STP domains

The core in this design is explicitly Layer 3 only, making it technically incapable of terminating a Layer 2 interconnection regardless of STP domain isolation benefits.

Cat the core layer because all external connections must terminate there for security reasons

There is no valid design principle requiring all external connections to terminate at the core for security - this is not supported by Cisco data center hierarchical design guidelines.

Dat the aggregation layer because it is the Layer 2 to Layer 3 demarcation pointCorrect

The aggregation layer is the Layer 2 to Layer 3 demarcation point in a three-layer data center design, making it the natural and correct termination point for Layer 2 WAN interconnections. Since HSRP is deployed at the aggregation layer as the default gateway for VLANs, terminating the L2 link here keeps the HSRP active gateway directly reachable across the interconnect. This also prevents STP domains from extending unnecessarily into the core or access layers.

Concept tested: Layer 2 interconnection termination point in three-tier DC design

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/DC_Infra2_5/DCinf_ch3.html

Topics

#DCI termination point#three-layer hierarchy#HSRP#L2/L3 demarcation

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 400-007 Practice