nerdexam
Cisco

400-007 · Question #209

Router R1 is a BGP speaker with one peering neighbor over link "A". When the R1 link/interface "A" fails, routing announcements are terminated, which results in the tearing down of the state for all…

The correct answer is D. fate sharing. When BGP link A fails, both the peering session and all associated route state are lost simultaneously because every dependent component shares the same failure domain - a textbook example of fate sharing.

Designing Network Infrastructure

Question

Router R1 is a BGP speaker with one peering neighbor over link "A". When the R1 link/interface "A" fails, routing announcements are terminated, which results in the tearing down of the state for all BGP routes at each end of the link. What is this a good example of?

Options

  • Afault isolation
  • Bresiliency
  • Credundancy
  • Dfate sharing

How the community answered

(33 responses)
  • A
    3% (1)
  • B
    9% (3)
  • C
    6% (2)
  • D
    82% (27)

Why each option

When BGP link A fails, both the peering session and all associated route state are lost simultaneously because every dependent component shares the same failure domain - a textbook example of fate sharing.

Afault isolation

Fault isolation refers to containing a failure to prevent it from spreading to unrelated components, which is the opposite of the shared-fate behavior described here.

Bresiliency

Resiliency refers to a system's ability to withstand or recover from failures, not the characteristic of tightly coupled dependency described in this scenario.

Credundancy

Redundancy refers to having backup components or alternate paths available, which this single-link, single-session topology explicitly lacks.

Dfate sharingCorrect

Fate sharing describes a design characteristic where multiple components are bound to the same failure domain, meaning if one fails, all others sharing that dependency fail together. In this scenario, the BGP session and all route state at both ends depend entirely on link A - when it fails, everything sharing that fate is torn down simultaneously. This is the canonical definition of fate sharing in network design, distinguishing it from intentional redundancy or isolation strategies.

Concept tested: BGP fate sharing and shared failure domain design

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_bgp/configuration/xe-16/irg-xe-16-book.html

Topics

#BGP#fate sharing#fault isolation#link failure

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 400-007 Practice