352-001 · Question #459
You are asked to design an RSVP-TE LSP protection solution for a large service provider network. Which traffic protection mechanism is highly scalable and ensures that multiple LSPs always terminate a
The correct answer is C. 1:N protection. 1:N protection uses a single shared backup LSP to protect multiple primary LSPs that all converge at the same merge point, making it the most scalable RSVP-TE protection model.
Question
You are asked to design an RSVP-TE LSP protection solution for a large service provider network. Which traffic protection mechanism is highly scalable and ensures that multiple LSPs always terminate at the same merge point?
Options
- Adetour LSPs
- B1:1 protection
- C1:N protection
- Dshared-explicit reservation style
How the community answered
(48 responses)- A13% (6)
- B4% (2)
- C63% (30)
- D21% (10)
Why each option
1:N protection uses a single shared backup LSP to protect multiple primary LSPs that all converge at the same merge point, making it the most scalable RSVP-TE protection model.
Detour LSPs provide per-LSP local repair by creating individual bypass tunnels around a failed node or link, which does not scale well in large networks because every protected LSP requires its own dedicated detour path.
1:1 protection dedicates one unique backup LSP for every single primary LSP, consuming significantly more bandwidth and signaling resources, making it poorly suited for large-scale deployments.
1:N protection maps one backup LSP to N primary LSPs, all of which share the same merge point at the tail end. This is highly scalable because only one set of backup resources is reserved regardless of how many primary LSPs are protected. When a failure occurs on any of the N primary LSPs, traffic is rerouted onto the single shared backup path without requiring per-LSP backup provisioning.
Shared-explicit reservation style is an RSVP session attribute that allows multiple senders to share a single reservation object, but it is not a defined LSP protection model and does not prescribe a common merge point architecture.
Concept tested: RSVP-TE 1:N LSP protection scalability and merge point
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_te_path_protect/configuration/xe-16/mp-te-path-protect-xe-16-book/mp-te-1-to-1-path-protection.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.