nerdexam
Cisco

352-001 · Question #227

An enterprise has a large number of retail locations that are currently serviced by a hub-and- spoke Frame Relay network using OSPF as the routing protocol. The enterprise is planning to deploy a…

The correct answer is D. L3VPNs (RFC 2547-based) using MP-BGP. RFC 2547-based MPLS L3VPNs with MP-BGP provide scalable any-to-any connectivity across a provider backbone without requiring a full mesh of tunnels between every site.

Designing Network Services

Question

An enterprise has a large number of retail locations that are currently serviced by a hub-and- spoke Frame Relay network using OSPF as the routing protocol. The enterprise is planning to deploy a high-bandwidth application that requires any-to-any connectivity. Which technology would provide this enterprise with the best bandwidth utilization and greatest scalability?

Options

  • Apseudowires based on L2TPv3
  • Bmultipoint GRE tunnels between all locations
  • Ca full mesh of IPsec tunnels between all locations
  • DL3VPNs (RFC 2547-based) using MP-BGP

How the community answered

(23 responses)
  • A
    4% (1)
  • B
    4% (1)
  • C
    13% (3)
  • D
    78% (18)

Why each option

RFC 2547-based MPLS L3VPNs with MP-BGP provide scalable any-to-any connectivity across a provider backbone without requiring a full mesh of tunnels between every site.

Apseudowires based on L2TPv3

Pseudowires based on L2TPv3 provide point-to-point Layer 2 circuits, not scalable any-to-any Layer 3 connectivity suitable for a large retail deployment.

Bmultipoint GRE tunnels between all locations

Multipoint GRE tunnels require a full mesh to achieve any-to-any connectivity, resulting in O(n-squared) tunnel scaling and high management overhead as the number of locations grows.

Ca full mesh of IPsec tunnels between all locations

A full mesh of IPsec tunnels has the same O(n-squared) scaling limitation as GRE and adds encryption processing overhead, making it unsuitable for a high-bandwidth, large-scale retail deployment.

DL3VPNs (RFC 2547-based) using MP-BGPCorrect

L3VPNs using RFC 2547 allow any-to-any connectivity by routing VPN traffic through a shared MPLS backbone, where PE routers exchange customer VPN routes via MP-BGP and forward traffic using MPLS label switching. This architecture scales linearly because adding a new retail site requires only a single PE connection rather than tunnels to every other site, while MPLS label switching maximizes bandwidth utilization compared to overlay encapsulation.

Concept tested: MPLS L3VPN RFC 2547 scalability and any-to-any connectivity

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book/mp-bgp-mpls-vpn.html

Topics

#L3VPN#MPLS#any-to-any connectivity#scalability

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 352-001 Practice