Refer to the exhibit. An engineer configures the BGP adjacency between R1 and R2; however, it fails to establish. Which action resolves the issue?

A BGP `network` statement is used to advertise routes into BGP from the local router's routing table; it does not directly affect the establishment of a BGP peering session itself.

While changing the remote-as number is the correct action, this option is incomplete as it does not specify *what* the remote-as number should be changed *to* for 192.168.100.11.

BGP synchronization is a legacy feature, usually disabled in modern networks, that prevents a router from advertising prefixes learned via iBGP unless they are also reachable via an IGP; it rarely causes eBGP adjacency failures.

BGP adjacencies require both peering routers to be configured with the correct remote AS number of their neighbor. Changing the `remote-as` number on R1 to 6500 for neighbor 192.168.100.11 implies that 6500 is the correct AS of R2, which would resolve the adjacency establishment failure caused by a mismatch.