nerdexam
Cisco

300-420 · Question #135

An architect must address sustained congestion on the access and distribution uplink of network. QoS has already been implemented and optimized, but it is no longer effective in ensuring optimal…

The correct answer is C. Implement higher-speed uplink interfaces D. Bundle additional uplinks into logical EtherChannels. When QoS optimization is no longer effective in addressing sustained network congestion, the architect should improve network performance by increasing available bandwidth through implementing higher-speed uplink interfaces and bundling additional uplinks into logical…

Advanced Enterprise Campus Networks

Question

An architect must address sustained congestion on the access and distribution uplink of network. QoS has already been implemented and optimized, but it is no longer effective in ensuring optimal network performance. Which two solutions should the architect use to improver network performance? (Choose two)

Options

  • AReconfigure QoS based on the IntServ model
  • BUtilize random early detection to manage queues
  • CImplement higher-speed uplink interfaces
  • DBundle additional uplinks into logical EtherChannels
  • EConfigure selective packet discard to drop noncritical network traffic.

How the community answered

(43 responses)
  • A
    9% (4)
  • B
    5% (2)
  • C
    72% (31)
  • E
    14% (6)

Why each option

When QoS optimization is no longer effective in addressing sustained network congestion, the architect should improve network performance by increasing available bandwidth through implementing higher-speed uplink interfaces and bundling additional uplinks into logical EtherChannels.

AReconfigure QoS based on the IntServ model

Reconfiguring QoS based on the IntServ model is generally not scalable for enterprise networks, and the problem statement implies a bandwidth bottleneck rather than a QoS model deficiency, as QoS is already optimized.

BUtilize random early detection to manage queues

Utilizing random early detection (RED) is a QoS queue management mechanism to prevent tail drops, but it does not increase bandwidth and is likely part of the already optimized QoS configuration.

CImplement higher-speed uplink interfacesCorrect

Implementing higher-speed uplink interfaces directly increases the total available bandwidth, which is the most effective solution when sustained congestion persists despite QoS optimization.

DBundle additional uplinks into logical EtherChannelsCorrect

Bundling additional uplinks into logical EtherChannels (or Link Aggregation Groups) aggregates the bandwidth of multiple physical links, providing increased capacity and load distribution to alleviate sustained congestion.

EConfigure selective packet discard to drop noncritical network traffic.

Configuring selective packet discard drops lower-priority traffic during congestion, but it does not increase overall network performance for all traffic and implies that QoS is already in use for prioritization.

Concept tested: Network congestion mitigation and bandwidth expansion

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst9300/software/release/16-12/configuration_guide/lacp/b_1612_lacp_9300_cg/configuring_etherchannel.html

Topics

#Network Performance#Bandwidth Capacity#EtherChannel#Uplink Design

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-420 Practice