2V0-51.23 · Question #91
An administrator is leveraging PCoIP protocol in their Horizon environment and wants to distribute clients to end users that have the smallest footprint possible with no local operating system…
The correct answer is A. Teradici based zero clients. Teradici zero clients are purpose-built hardware devices that implement PCoIP entirely in firmware, meaning they have zero local operating system - just enough silicon to decode a PCoIP stream. This makes them the absolute smallest footprint option and the native match for…
Question
An administrator is leveraging PCoIP protocol in their Horizon environment and wants to distribute clients to end users that have the smallest footprint possible with no local operating system. Which client type satisfies these requirements?
Options
- ATeradici based zero clients
- BWindows embedded thin client
- CMacOS Client
- DAndroid based thin client
How the community answered
(39 responses)- A92% (36)
- B5% (2)
- C3% (1)
Explanation
Teradici zero clients are purpose-built hardware devices that implement PCoIP entirely in firmware, meaning they have zero local operating system - just enough silicon to decode a PCoIP stream. This makes them the absolute smallest footprint option and the native match for PCoIP since Teradici invented the protocol itself.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- B (Windows embedded thin client) still runs a stripped-down Windows OS, so it has a local operating system - violating the "no local OS" requirement.
- C (macOS client) is a full software client installed on a full macOS operating system - the largest footprint of all options.
- D (Android thin client) runs on the Android OS, so again, a local operating system is present.
Memory tip: Think zero client = zero OS. The word "zero" is the giveaway - zero clients have zero local operating system. Pair that with the fact that Teradici created PCoIP, so Teradici hardware + PCoIP protocol is always the tightest, most native fit in any Horizon exam question.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.