1Z0-518 · Question #76
Your functional end users are perplexed by the contents of the AutoInvoice Execution report. They needed expert guidance and cause to you. You look at the report and see that the Interface Lines…
The correct answer is D. A credit memo for an Invoice and the invoice Itself are submitted In the same batch and the credit. In Oracle AutoInvoice, a credit memo must reference an existing invoice to be processed. When a credit memo and the invoice it applies to are submitted in the same batch, the credit memo cannot complete processing because its parent invoice doesn't yet exist as a posted…
Question
Your functional end users are perplexed by the contents of the AutoInvoice Execution report. They needed expert guidance and cause to you. You look at the report and see that the Interface Lines section of the report shows the following:
Selected: 9 Successfully Processed: 8 Failed Validation: 0 What is the likely reason for this?
Options
- AAn adjustment update of an old Invoice Is Included In this batch.
- BThe General Ledger (GL) code combination 10 failed the cross validation rules.
- CA debit memo for an Invoice and the Invoice itself were submitted In the same batch tr\6 the debit
- DA credit memo for an Invoice and the invoice Itself are submitted In the same batch and the credit
- EThe GL code combination segment value for the cost center was valid in the prior calendar month
How the community answered
(38 responses)- A3% (1)
- B3% (1)
- C8% (3)
- D74% (28)
- E13% (5)
Explanation
In Oracle AutoInvoice, a credit memo must reference an existing invoice to be processed. When a credit memo and the invoice it applies to are submitted in the same batch, the credit memo cannot complete processing because its parent invoice doesn't yet exist as a posted transaction - so it ends up in a pending/on-hold state rather than failing validation. This explains the gap: 9 selected, 8 successfully processed, 0 failed validation - the 1 unaccounted line is the credit memo that was neither processed nor rejected.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A - Adjustments to old invoices don't flow through the AutoInvoice interface the same way, and wouldn't create this specific count discrepancy.
- B & E - Both GL-related issues (cross-validation failures, expired segment values) would cause the line to appear under Failed Validation, not disappear from the count entirely.
- C - Debit memos don't carry the same parent-invoice dependency that credit memos do in AutoInvoice processing.
Memory tip: Think of a credit memo as a child that can't exist without its parent. If parent and child arrive at school on the same bus, the parent hasn't "enrolled" yet - so the child is stuck at the door, not rejected, just waiting. That's your missing line.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.