nerdexam
CompTIA

SY0-501 · Question #106

New magnetic locks were ordered for an entire building. In accordance with company policy, employee safety is the top priority. In case of a fire where electricity is cut, which of the following…

The correct answer is A. Fail safe. When installing new magnetic locks, the primary consideration should be 'fail safe' to ensure employee safety by allowing doors to unlock during a power outage, such as in a fire.

Submitted by zhang_li· Mar 4, 2026Security architecture

Question

New magnetic locks were ordered for an entire building. In accordance with company policy, employee safety is the top priority. In case of a fire where electricity is cut, which of the following should be taken into consideration when installing the new locks?

Options

  • AFail safe
  • BFault tolerance
  • CFail secure
  • DRedundancy

How the community answered

(30 responses)
  • A
    80% (24)
  • B
    7% (2)
  • C
    3% (1)
  • D
    10% (3)

Why each option

When installing new magnetic locks, the primary consideration should be 'fail safe' to ensure employee safety by allowing doors to unlock during a power outage, such as in a fire.

AFail safeCorrect

Magnetic locks are inherently fail-safe because they require continuous power to remain locked; thus, upon a power failure, they disengage and unlock. This design prioritizes employee safety during emergencies like a fire by ensuring that occupants can freely exit the building when electricity is cut.

BFault tolerance

Fault tolerance refers to a system's ability to continue operating despite component failures, which is not the primary consideration for the specific *state* of a lock during a complete power outage for immediate egress safety.

CFail secure

Fail secure means the lock remains locked upon power failure, which would prevent egress and endanger employees during a fire, directly contradicting the priority of employee safety.

DRedundancy

Redundancy involves having duplicate components or systems for continuous operation and fault tolerance, but it does not define the default safety state of a magnetic lock itself upon complete power loss.

Concept tested: Fail-safe vs. Fail-secure physical security

Source: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-116r1.pdf

Topics

#fail safe#physical access controls#magnetic locks#emergency egress

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full SY0-501 Practice