nerdexam
CompTIA

SY0-501 · Question #143

The chief security officer (CS0) has issued a new policy that requires that all internal websites be configured for HTTPS traffic only. The network administrator has been tasked to update all…

The correct answer is A. Use certificates signed by the company CA. To comply with a policy mandating HTTPS for all internal websites without additional costs, leveraging an existing internal company Certificate Authority (CA) is the most effective solution.

Submitted by tarun92· Mar 4, 2026Security architecture

Question

The chief security officer (CS0) has issued a new policy that requires that all internal websites be configured for HTTPS traffic only. The network administrator has been tasked to update all internal sites without incurring additional costs. Which of the following is the best solution for the network administrator to secure each internal website?

Options

  • AUse certificates signed by the company CA
  • BUse a signing certificate as a wild card certificate
  • CUse certificates signed by a public ca
  • DUse a self-signed certificate on each internal server

How the community answered

(59 responses)
  • A
    83% (49)
  • B
    5% (3)
  • C
    10% (6)
  • D
    2% (1)

Why each option

To comply with a policy mandating HTTPS for all internal websites without additional costs, leveraging an existing internal company Certificate Authority (CA) is the most effective solution.

AUse certificates signed by the company CACorrect

An internal company CA can issue trusted certificates for internal servers at no additional monetary cost, as the organization already owns and operates the CA infrastructure and internal clients can be configured to implicitly trust it through group policies or similar mechanisms.

BUse a signing certificate as a wild card certificate

Using a wildcard certificate is a method for simplifying certificate management across multiple subdomains, but it does not inherently address the cost constraint nor specify the type of CA needed to establish trusted internal certificates without additional expense.

CUse certificates signed by a public ca

Certificates signed by a public CA would incur significant recurring costs for acquisition and renewal, directly violating the requirement to update the sites without incurring additional costs.

DUse a self-signed certificate on each internal server

Self-signed certificates require manual trust configuration on every client and generate security warnings, making them impractical, unscalable, and not a user-friendly solution for a company-wide security policy.

Concept tested: Internal PKI and Certificate Management for Web Servers

Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-cs/active-directory-certificate-services-overview

Topics

#HTTPS#internal CA#PKI#certificate management

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full SY0-501 Practice