SK0-004 · Question #790
A server is connected to a switch, and the server is experiencing erratic connectivity issues. Which of the following should be checked FIRST?
The correct answer is C. Duplex settings. Erratic connectivity between a server and a switch is most commonly caused by a duplex mismatch, where one end operates at half-duplex and the other at full-duplex.
Question
A server is connected to a switch, and the server is experiencing erratic connectivity issues. Which of the following should be checked FIRST?
Options
- ARouting
- BSpeed settings
- CDuplex settings
- DNAT settings
How the community answered
(27 responses)- A4% (1)
- B4% (1)
- C93% (25)
Why each option
Erratic connectivity between a server and a switch is most commonly caused by a duplex mismatch, where one end operates at half-duplex and the other at full-duplex.
Routing is a Layer 3 concern and would typically cause complete loss of connectivity to remote networks rather than erratic local link behavior between a server and its directly connected switch.
Speed mismatches between a server and switch usually result in a complete link failure rather than erratic connectivity, because Ethernet cannot establish a link at all when speeds are incompatible.
A duplex mismatch causes the half-duplex side to use CSMA/CD collision detection while the full-duplex side transmits freely, resulting in late collisions, excessive retransmissions, and erratic throughput degradation. This is the first and most likely culprit for intermittent or erratic connectivity when a server is directly connected to a switch, as auto-negotiation failures can silently produce this mismatch.
NAT (Network Address Translation) is configured on a router or firewall and affects address translation for Internet-bound traffic, not the local physical link behavior between a server and a switch.
Concept tested: Duplex mismatch diagnosis on server-switch links
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/ethernet/10561-3.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.