SK0-004 · Question #775
An administrator is building a new mission-critical server. In the past, this server has gone down when two drives have failed at the same time. The administrator wants to prevent this from…
The correct answer is C. RAID 6. RAID 6 uses dual distributed parity, allowing the array to survive two simultaneous drive failures - exactly the failure scenario the administrator needs to prevent.
Question
An administrator is building a new mission-critical server. In the past, this server has gone down when two drives have failed at the same time. The administrator wants to prevent this from happening with the new server. Which of the following is the BEST RAID type for the administrator to select in this situation?
Options
- ARAID 0
- BRAID 5
- CRAID 6
- DRAID 10
How the community answered
(50 responses)- A6% (3)
- B14% (7)
- C78% (39)
- D2% (1)
Why each option
RAID 6 uses dual distributed parity, allowing the array to survive two simultaneous drive failures - exactly the failure scenario the administrator needs to prevent.
RAID 0 is pure striping with zero redundancy, meaning even a single drive failure causes complete and unrecoverable data loss.
RAID 5 uses only single distributed parity, tolerating exactly one drive failure - a second simultaneous failure destroys the array.
RAID 6 writes two independent parity blocks across all drives in the array, enabling recovery from any two simultaneous drive failures without data loss. This directly addresses the stated problem where two concurrent failures previously caused downtime. RAID 5 and other types cannot provide this same two-fault tolerance level.
RAID 10 can tolerate multiple failures only when each failed drive belongs to a different mirrored pair - two drives failing within the same mirror simultaneously still results in data loss.
Concept tested: RAID 6 dual parity fault tolerance
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/storage-spaces/storage-spaces-fault-tolerance
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.