nerdexam
CompTIA

PT0-001 · Question #151

After establishing a shell on a target system, Joe, a penetration tester is aware that his actions have not been detected. He now wants to maintain persistent access to the machine. Which of the…

The correct answer is C. Modify a known boot time service to instantiate a call back. Modifying a known boot-time service to establish a callback is the most easily detected persistence method because security tools actively and continuously monitor changes to registered startup services.

Post-exploitation and lateral movement

Question

After establishing a shell on a target system, Joe, a penetration tester is aware that his actions have not been detected. He now wants to maintain persistent access to the machine. Which of the following methods would be MOST easily detected?

Options

  • ARun a zero-day exploit.
  • BCreate a new domain user with a known password.
  • CModify a known boot time service to instantiate a call back.
  • DObtain cleartext credentials of the compromised user.

How the community answered

(32 responses)
  • A
    28% (9)
  • B
    6% (2)
  • C
    53% (17)
  • D
    13% (4)

Why each option

Modifying a known boot-time service to establish a callback is the most easily detected persistence method because security tools actively and continuously monitor changes to registered startup services.

ARun a zero-day exploit.

A zero-day exploit by definition has no existing detection signatures or behavioral baselines, making it the least likely method to trigger an alert in security monitoring tools.

BCreate a new domain user with a known password.

Creating a new domain user is auditable through Active Directory logs, but in large environments new accounts can blend in and may not be reviewed as quickly as a direct change to a monitored service.

CModify a known boot time service to instantiate a call back.Correct

Altering a known boot-time service creates highly visible artifacts in the Windows Service Control Manager, system event logs (Event ID 7045 and similar), and any file integrity monitoring solution watching service binaries and configuration. Most SIEM platforms and EDR tools have default rules specifically alerting on service modifications, making this change detectable almost immediately upon execution or the next system review.

DObtain cleartext credentials of the compromised user.

Obtaining cleartext credentials is a passive, read-only action that leaves minimal forensic artifacts and is far less likely to generate an automated security alert than modifying a service configuration.

Concept tested: Persistence technique detection risk for boot-time services

Source: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1543/

Topics

#persistence#detection risk#post-exploitation#domain user creation

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full PT0-001 Practice