PMP · Question #1211
A new marketing vice president just joined a software startup and is concerned that the agile model does not provide the needed accountability for their role. What should the responsible project…
The correct answer is C. Leverage the use of the review/demo sessions with the vice president to acknowledge that the. To address the VP's concerns about accountability in an agile model, the project manager should utilize review/demo sessions to provide transparent demonstrations of completed work, allowing the VP to acknowledge progress and adherence to agreements.
Question
Options
- AEstablish an executive review board where all stakeholders discuss and approve features and
- BFoster an environment of open communication where all parties can discuss issues and agree on
- CLeverage the use of the review/demo sessions with the vice president to acknowledge that the
- DRequire proper approval of all requirements from the marketing vice president and formally
How the community answered
(65 responses)- A3% (2)
- B15% (10)
- C72% (47)
- D9% (6)
Why each option
To address the VP's concerns about accountability in an agile model, the project manager should utilize review/demo sessions to provide transparent demonstrations of completed work, allowing the VP to acknowledge progress and adherence to agreements.
Establishing an executive review board for all features can introduce bureaucracy and slow down the agile development process, counteracting the benefits of agility.
While fostering open communication is generally good, it may not directly provide the tangible evidence of accountability and agreement fulfillment that a new VP might seek in an agile environment.
Agile review or demo sessions are specifically designed to showcase completed increments of work to stakeholders, allowing them to inspect the product, provide feedback, and acknowledge the team's progress. Leveraging these sessions offers a direct and transparent way for the marketing VP to see that the project is meeting its agreements and delivering value, thereby building comfort and trust in the agile process and addressing accountability concerns.
Requiring formal approval of all requirements contradicts the adaptive nature of agile, where requirements can evolve, and would revert to a more traditional, less flexible project approach.
Concept tested: Agile stakeholder transparency and accountability
Source: https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/agile-practice-guide
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.