PMP · Question #1189
A project manager assigned to an engineering construction project is receiving questions from the site engineers. Several questions are related to carrying out activities to meet timelines that compro
The correct answer is C. Reinforce to all engineers the company vision of a safety-first approach to project activities.. When engineers feel pressured to compromise safety for timelines and lack decision-making empowerment, the project manager must reinforce the company's safety-first vision to guide their actions and decisions.
Question
A project manager assigned to an engineering construction project is receiving questions from the site engineers. Several questions are related to carrying out activities to meet timelines that compromise the work crew's safety. When reviewing these questions, the project manager realizes that the engineers do not feel empowered to make decisions. How should the project manager address this?
Options
- AConsult the previous project manager to discuss how they managed these questions.
- BEmail the company vision to the engineers and tell them they need to meet deadlines.
- CReinforce to all engineers the company vision of a safety-first approach to project activities.
- DEnsure all engineers are aware that questions should only be submitted in their weekly reports.
How the community answered
(33 responses)- A15% (5)
- B6% (2)
- C76% (25)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
When engineers feel pressured to compromise safety for timelines and lack decision-making empowerment, the project manager must reinforce the company's safety-first vision to guide their actions and decisions.
Consulting a previous PM might offer historical context but does not proactively address the current team's immediate empowerment and safety concerns.
Emailing the company vision while still emphasizing deadlines without explicitly prioritizing safety would only increase the pressure and exacerbate the problem.
By clearly reinforcing the company's safety-first vision, the project manager empowers engineers to prioritize safety without fear of repercussion for potential timeline impacts. This aligns their decision-making with core company values and directly addresses the underlying issue of feeling unempowered in safety-critical situations.
Restricting questions to weekly reports inhibits timely communication of critical safety concerns and further disempowers engineers from seeking immediate guidance.
Concept tested: Project leadership, team empowerment, and safety culture
Topics
Community Discussion
9C is correct because safety always trumps schedule in PMI land, no exceptions. When the team lacks empowerment around safety decisions, the PM needs to clearly communicate the organizational stance so engineers understand that a safety-first mindset is the expected culture, not something they need to second-guess. A is a time-waster, B is a schedule-over-safety violation, and D just buries real safety concerns in a weekly report where they could sit unread for days. On exam day, if you see safety mentioned, that option almost always wins.
Agree on C as the exam answer but would add that the deeper Agile principle here is psychological safety, not just physical safety, so the PM is really modeling that speaking up about any concern is always welcome, which is what makes self-organizing teams actually work.
C is right. My senior always says safety-first vision empowers the team to push back.
C is the right pick, but the real testing center tip here is that flagging questions works the same way: you push back on the exam itself by marking anything that feels off and circling back after you clear the easier items.
C is the right call here. Had almost this exact scenario on my exam last spring, and the trick is recognizing that empowerment issues get solved by making the guiding principle crystal clear, not by tightening process or deflecting to the old PM. Once engineers hear safety-first stated explicitly, they have the anchor they need to make the call themselves.
Agreed on C, and to Wei's point, the safety-first principle also directly supports the "think and work holistically" principle since engineers are already weighing downstream impact, they just need explicit permission to prioritize it.
C, safety-first vision is the only one that empowers correct decisions here.
Agreed on C, and the way our team lead explained it, safety-first also means the model defers instead of guessing when confidence is low, which is really the other half of making correct decisions.
C on my exam last month, and our group all landed on the same thing. The safety-first angle is the giveaway here, and B is a trap because it ignores the safety concern entirely.