Refer to the exhibit. In the network shown in the exhibit, the web client cannot connect to the HTTP web server. The administrator runs the FortiGate built-in sniffer and gets the output as shown in…

Running a sniffer on the web server might be useful later, but the FortiGate's internal processing is the immediate unknown, as the FortiGate sniffer already indicates the packet is leaving the device.

Capturing traffic with an external sniffer on port1 would replicate what the FortiGate's built-in sniffer already shows (traffic exiting FortiGate), so it wouldn't provide new insights into FortiGate's internal handling.

Executing another sniffer with the filter 'host 10.0.1.10' is redundant since the initial sniffer likely already shows this traffic and a debug flow would offer much deeper insight into *why* the traffic is failing, rather than just *if* it's present.

The FortiGate sniffer output shows traffic exiting port1 towards the web server, indicating the FortiGate is forwarding the packet. If the web client still cannot connect, a debug flow provides detailed internal processing steps, including policy matching, NAT, route lookups, and any security features that might be dropping or altering the packet, which is essential to determine why the connection fails despite the packet exiting the FortiGate.