JN0-1103 · Question #17
Your manager asks you to determine a reliable, cost-effective solution to connect a building access switch to a building distribution switch at a distance of 400 feet (120 meters) in the same…
The correct answer is B. multimode fiber. Multimode fiber is the right choice because the 120-meter (400-foot) run exceeds UTP's 100-meter maximum distance limit, making copper unreliable at this length. Multimode fiber handles up to 550 meters (OM3) or beyond, is well-suited for intra-building switch-to-switch links…
Question
Your manager asks you to determine a reliable, cost-effective solution to connect a building access switch to a building distribution switch at a distance of 400 feet (120 meters) in the same building. What would you use in this scenario?
Options
- AUTP
- Bmultimode fiber
- CPoE
- DWi-Fi bridge
How the community answered
(20 responses)- A10% (2)
- B80% (16)
- C5% (1)
- D5% (1)
Explanation
Multimode fiber is the right choice because the 120-meter (400-foot) run exceeds UTP's 100-meter maximum distance limit, making copper unreliable at this length. Multimode fiber handles up to 550 meters (OM3) or beyond, is well-suited for intra-building switch-to-switch links, and costs significantly less than single-mode fiber - hitting the "cost-effective" requirement.
Why the others are wrong:
- A (UTP): Tops out at 100 meters for standard Ethernet; at 120m you risk signal degradation and unreliable links - a direct disqualifier.
- C (PoE): Power over Ethernet delivers electrical power through a cable - it's a power delivery technology, not a distance-extension solution.
- D (Wi-Fi bridge): Wireless introduces latency, interference risk, and throughput variability - none of which are acceptable for a reliable switch uplink, and it's rarely cost-effective compared to running fiber once.
Memory tip: Think of 100m as UTP's hard wall - the moment a distance question pushes past 100 meters inside a building, multimode fiber is almost always the answer on the exam.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.