Which of the following statements best describes a functional difference between external auditors and internal auditors?

Question

Options

• AInternal auditors evaluate past achievements to understand whether controls are operating
• BInternal auditors provide assurance about the sufficiency of controls to manage risks. Including
• Cinternal auditors are always employed by the organization, rather than outsourced, and external
• DInternal auditors are most directly concerned with the detection of fraud, while external auditors

• A
  6% (1)
• B
  81% (13)
• D
  13% (2)

Explanation

Option B is correct because the defining functional role of internal auditors is to provide assurance to management and the board that controls are sufficient to manage the organization's risks - covering governance, risk management, and operational controls broadly, not just financial reporting.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is misleading because evaluating whether controls are operating is something both internal and external auditors do; the phrase "past achievements" also misframes what internal auditors assess - it's controls and risks, not accomplishments.
• C is factually wrong: internal audit functions can be outsourced or co-sourced to third-party firms, so employment status is not a reliable distinguishing characteristic, and the statement is about structure rather than function anyway.
• D reverses the emphasis: fraud detection in financial statements is more central to the external auditor's mandate; internal auditors focus on control adequacy and risk management, not fraud detection as a primary concern.

Memory tip: Think of it as audience and scope - Internal auditors report to management/the board and cover the full risk landscape ("are our controls good enough?"), while external auditors report to shareholders and focus on whether financial statements are fairly presented.

No community discussion yet for this question.