nerdexam
HP

HPE6-A49 · Question #52

A customer has already upgraded the wireless services for several buildings at a campus with an Aruba network, which has 250 APs and 6500 wireless clients. The network core currently has a cluster…

The correct answer is D. The local MCs are required to support autonomous operation despite link failures. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.

Question

A customer has already upgraded the wireless services for several buildings at a campus with an Aruba network, which has 250 APs and 6500 wireless clients. The network core currently has a cluster of two MC 7210s. Now the customer needs a wireless upgrade at another building on the campus, which is connected to the network core with 8 strands of SM fiber at a distance of 1800 feet (550 m). This building has its own local data center and Internet connection. The company would like it to be able to operate completely autonomously if its aggregation layer loses connectivity with the core. The architect has determined that this building has 1000 wireless clients and will require 35 APs. The architect recommends two new MC 7030 to be deployed at the aggregation layer in the building, rather than the network core. What justifies this recommendation?

Options

  • AThe existing MCs cannot support the load alone after the addition of the new APs.
  • BThe existing MCs cannot support the load alone after the addition of the new clients.
  • CThe new building is too far away from the network core for AP-to-MC connections.
  • DThe local MCs are required to support autonomous operation despite link failures.

How the community answered

(23 responses)
  • A
    4% (1)
  • B
    4% (1)
  • C
    13% (3)
  • D
    78% (18)

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full HPE6-A49 Practice