CRISC · Question #40
In order to determining a risk is under-controlled the risk practitioner will need to
The correct answer is A. understand the risk tolerance. To determine if a risk is under-controlled, a risk practitioner must understand the organization's defined risk tolerance. This benchmark indicates the acceptable level of residual risk.
Question
In order to determining a risk is under-controlled the risk practitioner will need to
Options
- Aunderstand the risk tolerance
- Bmonitor and evaluate IT performance
- Cidentify risk management best practices
- Ddetermine the sufficiency of the IT risk budget
How the community answered
(35 responses)- A94% (33)
- B3% (1)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
To determine if a risk is under-controlled, a risk practitioner must understand the organization's defined risk tolerance. This benchmark indicates the acceptable level of residual risk.
A risk is considered 'under-controlled' if its current residual level exceeds the organization's defined risk tolerance. Therefore, to make this determination, the risk practitioner must clearly understand the established risk tolerance, which serves as the benchmark for acceptable risk exposure.
Monitoring and evaluating IT performance helps in identifying operational issues but doesn't, by itself, determine if a specific risk is under-controlled relative to tolerance.
Identifying risk management best practices informs how risks should be managed but doesn't directly help in determining if an *existing* risk is currently under-controlled.
Determining the sufficiency of the IT risk budget relates to resource allocation but is not the direct measure for assessing if a risk is currently exceeding acceptable limits.
Concept tested: Risk tolerance and control assessment
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.