CRISC · Question #380
A risk practitioner has been asked to assess the risk associated with a new critical application used by a financial process team that the risk practitioner was a member of two years ago. Which of…
The correct answer is D. Participation in the risk assessment may constitute a conflict of interest. The greatest concern in this scenario is a conflict of interest, as the risk practitioner's prior involvement with the financial process team could bias their assessment of the new application.
Question
A risk practitioner has been asked to assess the risk associated with a new critical application used by a financial process team that the risk practitioner was a member of two years ago. Which of the following is the GREATEST concern with this request?
Options
- AThe risk assessment team may be overly confident of its ability to identify issues.
- BThe risk practitioner may be unfamiliar with recent application and process changes.
- CThe risk practitioner may still have access rights to the financial system.
- DParticipation in the risk assessment may constitute a conflict of interest.
How the community answered
(34 responses)- A9% (3)
- B24% (8)
- C6% (2)
- D62% (21)
Why each option
The greatest concern in this scenario is a conflict of interest, as the risk practitioner's prior involvement with the financial process team could bias their assessment of the new application.
Overconfidence is a general human factor risk, but a direct conflict of interest stemming from prior involvement is a more specific and significant ethical concern in this scenario.
Being unfamiliar with recent changes is a valid concern, but it's a matter of competency and due diligence (which can be mitigated by training/research) rather than an inherent ethical conflict.
While the practitioner *may* still have access rights, this is an access management issue that should have been addressed upon their role change, not the *greatest* concern related to their ability to perform an impartial assessment.
A risk practitioner assessing a system or process they were directly involved with previously, especially in an operational capacity, creates a significant conflict of interest. Their past involvement could lead to unconscious bias, either overlooking potential risks or favoring previous design decisions, compromising the impartiality and objectivity required for a credible risk assessment.
Concept tested: Conflict of interest in risk assessment
Source: https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/code-of-professional-ethics
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.