CRISC · Question #198
When performing a risk assessment of a new service to support a core business process, which of the following should be done FIRST to ensure continuity of operations?
The correct answer is B. Identify conditions that may cause disruptions. When assessing a new service for continuity, the first step is to identify conditions that could cause disruptions, as this forms the basis for all subsequent risk planning.
Question
When performing a risk assessment of a new service to support a core business process, which of the following should be done FIRST to ensure continuity of operations?
Options
- ADefine metrics for restoring availability.
- BIdentify conditions that may cause disruptions.
- CReview incident response procedures.
- DEvaluate the probability of risk events.
How the community answered
(23 responses)- A4% (1)
- B91% (21)
- C4% (1)
Why each option
When assessing a new service for continuity, the first step is to identify conditions that could cause disruptions, as this forms the basis for all subsequent risk planning.
Defining metrics for restoring availability, such as RTO/RPO, is a critical step but can only be effectively done after identifying what disruptions might occur and their potential impact.
To ensure continuity, the fundamental first step is to understand what can cause the service to fail. Identifying conditions that may cause disruptions (threats and vulnerabilities) provides a comprehensive overview of potential failure points, which then informs further analysis like probability, impact, and recovery planning.
Reviewing incident response procedures is part of planning for continuity, but the adequacy of these procedures depends on first understanding the range of potential disruptions.
Evaluating the probability of risk events is a crucial component of a risk assessment, but it logically follows the initial identification of the specific events or conditions themselves.
Concept tested: Risk assessment initial steps (continuity)
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.