CISA · Question #51
A senior auditor is reviewing work papers prepared by a junior auditor indicating that a finding was removed after the auditee said they corrected the problem. Which of the following is the senior…
The correct answer is B. Have the finding reinstated. A senior auditor must reinstate a finding if a junior auditor removed it based solely on the auditee's claim of correction without independent verification.
Question
A senior auditor is reviewing work papers prepared by a junior auditor indicating that a finding was removed after the auditee said they corrected the problem. Which of the following is the senior auditor's MOST appropriate course of action?
Options
- AAsk the auditee to retest.
- BHave the finding reinstated.
- CRefer the issue to the audit director.
- DApprove the work papers as written.
How the community answered
(54 responses)- A15% (8)
- B74% (40)
- C7% (4)
- D4% (2)
Why each option
A senior auditor must reinstate a finding if a junior auditor removed it based solely on the auditee's claim of correction without independent verification.
Asking the auditee to retest doesn't address the junior auditor's inappropriate removal of the finding without verification, which is a procedural issue.
Auditors must independently verify that an auditee has corrected a finding before removing it from audit work papers; relying solely on the auditee's claim is a breach of audit independence and due professional care. Reinstating the finding ensures proper audit procedures are followed and necessary verification steps are completed before closure.
Referring to the audit director might be a later step if the junior auditor resists, but the immediate and most appropriate action is to correct the procedural error.
Approving the work papers would condone a breach of audit standards and independence, as the finding was removed without independent verification.
Concept tested: Audit independence and verification
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.