CGEIT · Question #646
In which of the following situations is it acceptable to retain data beyond the stated policy?
The correct answer is B. There is a high probability that the enterprise will enter into litigation. Data retention policies can be superseded when legal hold requirements arise due to impending litigation, necessitating preservation of relevant data.
Question
In which of the following situations is it acceptable to retain data beyond the stated policy?
Options
- AThe business created an analytics model based on historical records.
- BThere is a high probability that the enterprise will enter into litigation.
- CNew data privacy regulations are expected in a few months.
- DA core system database is going through an upgrade.
How the community answered
(23 responses)- A4% (1)
- B78% (18)
- C13% (3)
- D4% (1)
Why each option
Data retention policies can be superseded when legal hold requirements arise due to impending litigation, necessitating preservation of relevant data.
While analytics models use historical data, this does not inherently justify retaining data beyond policy if it's not legally mandated or explicitly covered by an extended business purpose in the policy itself.
When there is a high probability of litigation, a legal hold is typically issued, which requires the organization to preserve all potentially relevant data, overriding standard data retention policies. This prevents spoliation of evidence that may be needed for legal proceedings.
Expected future regulations do not automatically justify retaining data beyond current policy; compliance would generally involve adjusting policies once regulations are enacted.
A database upgrade is an operational task that does not inherently change data retention requirements or policies.
Concept tested: Data retention legal holds
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/legal-hold?view=o365-worldwide
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.