A Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) is developing corrective-action plans based on the following output from a vulnerability scan of internal hosts: Which of the following is the MOST…

A business impact assessment by the product owner is the most appropriate corrective action because vulnerability findings on internal hosts often affect systems critical to business continuity, where immediate patching may cause downtime or service disruption. The product owner is best positioned to evaluate whether the organization can tolerate the residual risk of leaving the vulnerability unpatched versus the impact of applying a fix. This assessment drives an informed, risk-based remediation decision aligned with business priorities.

Static code analysis addresses weaknesses in application source code, but a vulnerability scan finding on an internal host is most likely an infrastructure or OS-level issue that static analysis tooling cannot detect or remediate.

Evaluating dependencies and upgrading is a valid technical remediation step, but it should follow a business impact assessment so the organization understands operational consequences before making potentially disruptive system changes.

Developing a custom IDS rule set is a detective and compensating control, not a corrective action - it may reduce exposure temporarily but does not remediate the underlying vulnerability identified by the scan.