CAS-003 · Question #231
During a security event investigation, a junior analyst fails to create an image of a server's hard drive before removing the drive and sending it to the forensics analyst. Later, the evidence from…
The correct answer is C. Order of volatility. Forensic investigators must image drives before physically moving them to preserve evidence in its original state, following order of volatility principles. Failing to image the drive before removal violates proper evidence collection sequence and introduces unverifiable doubt…
Question
During a security event investigation, a junior analyst fails to create an image of a server's hard drive before removing the drive and sending it to the forensics analyst. Later, the evidence from the analysis is not usable in the prosecution of the attackers due to the uncertainty of tampering. Which of the following should the junior analyst have followed?
Options
- AContinuity of operations
- BChain of custody
- COrder of volatility
- DData recovery
How the community answered
(35 responses)- A6% (2)
- B3% (1)
- C89% (31)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
Forensic investigators must image drives before physically moving them to preserve evidence in its original state, following order of volatility principles. Failing to image the drive before removal violates proper evidence collection sequence and introduces unverifiable doubt about tampering.
Continuity of operations is a business resilience concept focused on maintaining critical functions during disruptions and has no bearing on forensic evidence collection procedures.
Chain of custody documents who handled evidence and when, but the core procedural failure was not imaging the drive before removal - an error in evidence collection sequence rather than documentation.
Order of volatility is the forensic principle that evidence must be collected in sequence based on how quickly or easily it can be altered - disk images must be captured while the drive is in its original installed state before any physical handling occurs. By removing the drive without first creating a forensic image, the analyst broke the collection sequence required by order of volatility, making it impossible to prove the drive's contents were not altered during removal and transit, which rendered the evidence inadmissible.
Data recovery is the process of retrieving lost or corrupted data and is not a procedural framework governing how investigators must collect and preserve forensic evidence.
Concept tested: Forensic order of volatility in hard drive evidence collection
Source: https://www.nist.gov/publications/guide-integrating-forensic-techniques-incident-response
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.