nerdexam
CompTIA

CAS-003 · Question #442

A company that has been breached multiple times is looking to protect cardholder data. The previous undetected attacks all mimicked normal administrative-type behavior. The company must deploy a…

The correct answer is B. EDR D. DLP. EDR addresses behavioral detection, hash blocking, and alerting while DLP prevents cardholder data from leaving the environment - together they cover all four stated requirements. No single tool addresses all requirements alone.

Enterprise Security Operations

Question

A company that has been breached multiple times is looking to protect cardholder data. The previous undetected attacks all mimicked normal administrative-type behavior. The company must deploy a host solution to meet the following requirements:

  • Detect administrative actions
  • Block unwanted MD5 hashes
  • Provide alerts
  • Stop exfiltration of cardholder data

Which of the following solutions would BEST meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

Options

  • AAV
  • BEDR
  • CHIDS
  • DDLP
  • EHIPS
  • FEFS

How the community answered

(41 responses)
  • A
    5% (2)
  • B
    63% (26)
  • C
    12% (5)
  • E
    17% (7)
  • F
    2% (1)

Why each option

EDR addresses behavioral detection, hash blocking, and alerting while DLP prevents cardholder data from leaving the environment - together they cover all four stated requirements. No single tool addresses all requirements alone.

AAV

Antivirus relies on signature matching and cannot detect attacks that mimic legitimate administrative behavior or block hashes of files not in its database.

BEDRCorrect

EDR detects administrative-style attack behaviors through continuous behavioral monitoring, can block execution of files matching specific MD5 hashes, and generates alerts on suspicious activity - satisfying three of the four requirements.

CHIDS

A HIDS (Host Intrusion Detection System) monitors and logs suspicious activity but only detects - it does not block hash execution or prevent data exfiltration.

DDLPCorrect

DLP (Data Loss Prevention) inspects and controls data in motion, at rest, and in use, specifically preventing the exfiltration of sensitive data such as cardholder data - satisfying the fourth requirement that EDR alone cannot fulfill.

EHIPS

A HIPS focuses on blocking known attack patterns via rules; it lacks the behavioral analytics of EDR and does not provide DLP capabilities to stop data exfiltration.

FEFS

EFS (Encrypting File System) encrypts files at rest to prevent unauthorized access to stored data; it provides no detection, alerting, or exfiltration prevention capabilities.

Concept tested: Combining EDR and DLP for cardholder data protection

Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/dlp-learn-about-dlp

Topics

#EDR#DLP#cardholder data protection#insider threat detection

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CAS-003 Practice