CAS-003 · Question #360
An enterprise with global sites processes and exchanges highly sensitive information that is protected under several countries' arms trafficking laws. There is new information that malicious…
The correct answer is A. Add a second-layer VPN from a different vendor between sites. Adding a second VPN layer from a different vendor introduces implementation diversity, forcing a nation-state attacker to independently defeat two unrelated cryptographic systems.
Question
An enterprise with global sites processes and exchanges highly sensitive information that is protected under several countries' arms trafficking laws. There is new information that malicious nation-state- sponsored activities are targeting the use of encryption between the geographically disparate sites. The organization currently employs ECDSA and ECDH with P-384, SHA-384, and AES-256-GCM on VPNs between sites. Which of the following techniques would MOST likely improve the resilience of the enterprise to attack on cryptographic implementation?
Options
- AAdd a second-layer VPN from a different vendor between sites.
- BUpgrade the cipher suite to use an authenticated AES mode of operation.
- CUse a stronger elliptic curve cryptography algorithm.
- DImplement an IDS with sensors inside (clear-text) and outside (cipher-text) of each tunnel
- EEnsure cryptography modules are kept up to date from vendor supplying them.
How the community answered
(50 responses)- A70% (35)
- B8% (4)
- C4% (2)
- D16% (8)
- E2% (1)
Why each option
Adding a second VPN layer from a different vendor introduces implementation diversity, forcing a nation-state attacker to independently defeat two unrelated cryptographic systems.
A second-layer VPN from a separate vendor ensures that a vulnerability in one vendor's cryptographic libraries, hardware, or implementation cannot alone expose the communication channel. This defense-in-depth approach means an adversary must simultaneously compromise two independent cryptographic stacks with different code bases, algorithms, and supply chains. The technique directly addresses targeted nation-state attacks against a specific cryptographic implementation by eliminating any single point of cryptographic failure.
AES-256-GCM already operates in an authenticated encryption mode - Galois/Counter Mode provides both confidentiality and integrity - so switching to another authenticated AES mode delivers no meaningful security improvement.
P-384 is already among the strongest standardized NIST elliptic curves, and no currently approved curve provides substantially greater resistance against nation-state cryptanalytic capabilities.
An IDS with inside and outside sensors improves detection and forensics but does not strengthen the cryptographic implementation itself or prevent a successful attack on the cipher suite.
Keeping cryptographic modules current is sound operational hygiene but only addresses known published vulnerabilities rather than building fundamental resilience against active, targeted nation-state exploitation.
Concept tested: Defense-in-depth via multi-vendor VPN cryptographic diversity
Source: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-77/rev-1/final
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.