How is the Lock Out / Tag Outs application structured?

Question

Options

• ASpecify a Lock Out on an Asset with a Locking Device and define the Tag Out Operations.
• BSpecify a Lock Out on the Location or Asset and define the Tag Out Operations.
• CSpecify a Tag Out on the Location or Asset and define the Lock Out Operations.
• DDefine the isolation procedures on a set of related assets and specify a sequence.

• B
  4% (2)
• C
  93% (43)
• D
  2% (1)

Explanation

In Lock Out / Tag Out application systems, the Tag Out serves as the top-level record applied to a Location or Asset, and the Lock Out Operations are the specific isolation steps defined within it - making C correct. This structure reflects how real-world LOTO works: the tag out identifies what is being isolated (the location or asset), while the lock out operations describe how to isolate it (the physical steps applied to energy sources).

Why the distractors fail:

• A is wrong on two counts: it restricts to Assets only (excluding Locations) and incorrectly makes Lock Out the parent with Tag Out as subordinate steps.
• B is the most tempting distractor - it correctly includes "Location or Asset," but reverses the hierarchy by making Lock Out the parent and Tag Out the child operations.
• D describes an isolation procedure or energy control plan (sequenced steps across related assets), which is a different construct entirely, not the basic LOTO application structure.

Memory tip: Think "Tag first, then Lock" - the Tag Out is the Top-level container on the location/asset, and the Lock Out Operations drop down inside it. If you remember Tag wraps Lock, you won't be fooled by option B's reversal.

No community discussion yet for this question.