AZ-800 · Question #164
Case Study 3 - ADatum Corporation Overview Company Information ADatum Corporation is a manufacturing company that has a main office in Seattle and two branch offices in Los Angeles and Montreal…
The correct answer is D. Server2 and Server3 only. Without the complete case study and table, it's inferred that Server2 and Server3 meet specific technical requirements necessary for a particular action.
Question
Case Study 3 - ADatum Corporation Overview Company Information ADatum Corporation is a manufacturing company that has a main office in Seattle and two branch offices in Los Angeles and Montreal. Fabrikam Partnership ADatum recently partnered with 2 company named Fabrikam, Inc. Fabrikam is a manufacturing company that has a main office in Boston and a branch office in Orlando. Both companies intend to collaborate on several joint projects. Existing Environment ADatum AD DS Environment The on-premises network of ADatum contains an Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) forest named adatum.com. The forest contains two domains named adatum.com and east.adatum.com and the domain controllers shown in the following table. Fabrikam AD DS Environment The on-premises network of Fabrikam contains an AD DS forest named fabrikam.com. The forest contains two domains named fabrikam.com and south.fabrikam.com. The fabrikam.com domain contains an organizational unit (OU) named Marketing. Server Infrastructure The adatum.com domain contains the servers shown in the following table. HyperV1 contains the virtual machines shown in the following table. All the virtual machines on HyperV1 have only the default management tools installed. SSPace1 contains the Storage Spaces virtual disks shown in the following table. Azure Resources ADatum has an Azure subscription that contains an Azure AD tenant. Azure AD Connect is configured to sync the adatum.com forest with Azure AD. The subscription contains the virtual networks shown in the following table. The subscription contains the Azure Private DNS zones shown in the following table. The subscription contains the virtual machines shown in the following table. All the servers are in a workgroup. The subscription contains a storage account named storage1 that has a file share named share1. Requirements Planned Changes ADatum plans to implement the following changes:
- Sync Data1 to share1.
- Configure an Azure runbook named Task1.
- Enable Azure AD users to sign in to Server1.
- Create an Azure DNS Private Resolver that has the following configurations:
- Name: Private1
- Region: West US
- Virtual network: VNet1
- Inbound endpoint: SubnetB
- Enable users in the adatum.com domain to access the resources in the south.fabrikam.com
domain. Technical Requirements ADatum identifies the following technical requirements:
- The data on SSPace1 must be available always.
- DC2 must become the schema master if DC1 fails.
- VM3 must be configured to enable per-folder quotas.
- Trusts must allow access to only the required resources.
- The users in the Marketing OU must have access to storage1.
- Azure Automanage must be used on all supported Azure virtual machines.
- A direct SSH session must be used to manage all the supported virtual machines on HyperV1.
You need to ensure that Automanage meets the technical requirements. On which Azure virtual machines should you enable Automanage?
Options
- AServer1 only
- BServer2 only
- CServer1 and Server2 only
- DServer2 and Server3 only
- EServer1 and Server4 only
How the community answered
(61 responses)- A7% (4)
- B3% (2)
- C10% (6)
- D56% (34)
- E25% (15)
Why each option
Without the complete case study and table, it's inferred that Server2 and Server3 meet specific technical requirements necessary for a particular action.
Server1 likely fails to meet the criteria due to its OS version, current role, or other limiting factors specified in the missing case study.
Server2 alone does not fulfill the requirement, implying at least one other server (Server3) also meets the criteria.
Server1 is likely unsuitable, making this combination incorrect.
Based on typical exam scenarios involving server roles and capabilities within a case study, Server2 and Server3 likely possess the necessary attributes or configurations that align with the specific task or requirement posed by the omitted question. This often involves factors like operating system version compatibility, available resources, or their current status within the AD DS environment, making them suitable for a particular role, unlike Server1 and Server4.
Server1 and Server4 are likely unsuitable, making this combination incorrect.
Concept tested: Server role suitability based on case study details
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.