Which 2 actions should the Team Leader take to implement the new Must Have requirement?

Question

Options

• AConsolidate and circulate an agenda for the workshop.
• BAdd the additional tasks required to create the financial transaction
• CDiscuss the development interfaces and dependencies with the Solution
• DAgree to de-scope Should Have and/or Could Have requirements to allow
• ESource and hire a web developer with experience in developing online

• A
  4% (2)
• B
  78% (40)
• D
  6% (3)
• E
  12% (6)

Explanation

B and C are correct because they directly address what a Team Leader must do to implement a new Must Have requirement within an Agile/DSDM framework. Adding the necessary tasks (B) updates the plan to reflect the new work, ensuring the team knows what to build. Discussing interfaces and dependencies with the Solution Developer (C) is essential to understand technical constraints before development begins - skipping this risks integration failures.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A (agenda for a workshop) is a facilitation task unrelated to implementing a specific requirement.
• D (de-scoping lower-priority items) may become necessary to protect the timebox, but it is a consequence of capacity pressure, not an action taken to implement the requirement itself.
• E (hiring a web developer) is an assumption - the scenario doesn't indicate a skills gap exists, and hiring is outside the Team Leader's immediate implementation scope.

Memory tip: Think "Plan it, then coordinate it." When a new Must Have lands, you first update the plan with tasks (B), then align on technical dependencies (C). These two actions move the requirement from agreed to actionable - everything else (workshops, de-scoping, hiring) is either premature or situational.

No community discussion yet for this question.