AD0-E121 · Question #34
Regarding performance, what are the Adobe recommended response Time guidelines for uneached HTML requests?
The correct answer is B. 70% of the requests for pages should have a response in less than 100mt. Option B is correct because Adobe's performance guidelines specifically state that 70% of page requests should receive a response in under 100ms for uncached HTML - this is the benchmark Adobe uses to define acceptable baseline performance for their platforms (e.g., AEM). Why…
Question
Regarding performance, what are the Adobe recommended response Time guidelines for uneached HTML requests?
Options
- A30% of the requests for pages should have a response in less than 100ms.
- B70% of the requests for pages should have a response in less than 100mt
- C20% of the requests for pages should have a response in less than1 second.
- DNo pages should respond slower than an elapsed period o' 500ms.
How the community answered
(32 responses)- A6% (2)
- B91% (29)
- D3% (1)
Explanation
Option B is correct because Adobe's performance guidelines specifically state that 70% of page requests should receive a response in under 100ms for uncached HTML - this is the benchmark Adobe uses to define acceptable baseline performance for their platforms (e.g., AEM).
Why the others are wrong:
- A sets the threshold too low at 30% - Adobe's target is more than double that, reflecting a higher performance standard.
- C shifts the metric to 1 second (too slow) and uses only 20% as the target - both values are incorrect and represent a much weaker standard than Adobe recommends.
- D describes an absolute ceiling of 500ms with zero exceptions, which is not Adobe's guideline and conflates a percentile-based recommendation with a hard limit.
Memory tip: Think "70/100" - like a passing grade (70%) in under 100ms. If you remember that Adobe aims for a majority of requests to be lightning-fast (sub-100ms), you'll distinguish it from the weaker or incorrect thresholds in the distractors.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.