An IT company gets a new project. The sponsors want to know whether everything they are asking for can be completed within their time constraints and budget. What should the Business Practitioner…

Question

Options

• AUse AEM projects
• BDevelop in MVP plan
• CPerform risk assessment
• DOnboard trained technical resources

• A
  2% (1)
• B
  6% (3)
• C
  4% (2)
• D
  88% (46)

Explanation

Onboarding trained technical resources directly addresses the sponsors' concern because skilled personnel are required to accurately scope, estimate, and execute the project deliverables within the given time and budget - without them, no credible feasibility commitment can be made.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A (AEM Projects): This is a project management tool within AEM, not a solution to feasibility or capacity concerns.
• B (MVP Plan): An MVP approach means delivering less than everything requested, which directly contradicts the sponsors' goal of completing all requirements.
• C (Risk Assessment): Useful, but it identifies problems rather than providing the capability to actually meet the constraints - it's diagnostic, not prescriptive.

Memory tip: Think "no hands, no plan" - sponsors asking "can you deliver everything?" is fundamentally a capacity question, and the only honest answer requires having trained people who can assess and execute the full scope. Resources come before roadmaps.

No community discussion yet for this question.