What does "priority vs.impact" show?

Question

Options

• AThe sequence which products should be implemented,based on the company's available cash
• BThe relative levels of importance and impact,for projects within scope of the roadmap
• CHow projects could be most easily shifted among cloud and on-site infrastructure
• DThe relationship between initiatives and which executives have the highest level of support for

• A
  2% (1)
• B
  88% (43)
• C
  2% (1)
• D
  8% (4)

Explanation

Priority vs. Impact is a product roadmap framework that maps each initiative across two axes - how important/urgent it is (priority) and how much value it delivers (impact) - making B correct, as it captures exactly what this matrix reveals about projects within the roadmap's scope.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is wrong because sequencing by available cash describes a financial budgeting constraint, not a priority/impact analysis.
• C is wrong because cloud vs. on-site infrastructure migration is a technical deployment concern, unrelated to prioritization frameworks.
• D is wrong because executive sponsorship and initiative relationships describe stakeholder mapping or dependency charts, not a priority/impact grid.

Memory tip: Think of "priority vs. impact" as a 2x2 quadrant you'd sketch on a whiteboard - the axes are always how urgent (priority) and how valuable (impact), both scoped to what's already on the roadmap. If the answer mentions roadmap scope + importance + value, that's your signal for B.

No community discussion yet for this question.