Which statement is true about Interfaces and IP addresses on an Avaya Session Border Controller for t enterprise (SBCt) used for SIP Trunking and Remote Worker services?

Question

Options

• ASIP Trunking and Remote Worker services cannot run on the same SBCE.
• BOnly one IP address should be configured per interface.
• CSIP Trunking and Remote Worker services can share the same IP address.
• DSIP Trunking and Remote Worker services can use different IP addresses configured on the

• B
  5% (1)
• C
  5% (1)
• D
  91% (20)

Explanation

Option D is correct because the Avaya SBCE supports both SIP Trunking and Remote Worker services simultaneously on the same device, and each service type can be assigned its own distinct IP address on the same or different interfaces - allowing for proper traffic separation, security policies, and routing without conflict.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is false - both services absolutely can and commonly do coexist on the same SBCE; this is a standard enterprise deployment model.
• B is false - the SBCE supports multiple IP addresses per interface, which is essential for flexible service configuration.
• C is false - while technically possible in some edge cases, sharing a single IP address is not the recommended or typical design; separate IP addresses are used to distinguish and properly route each service type.

Memory tip: Think of the SBCE as a multi-tenant building - SIP Trunking and Remote Workers are different tenants that can live in the same building (same SBCE) but have their own mailboxes (different IP addresses) so their traffic is handled correctly and securely.

No community discussion yet for this question.