700-281 · Question #31
Which statement about HTTPS decryption on the WSA is true?
The correct answer is C. If WBRS is enabled, it can be used to determine whether the HTTPS traffic is to be decrypted. WBRS (Web-Based Reputation Score) is one of the valid policy conditions the Cisco WSA evaluates when deciding whether to decrypt HTTPS traffic - high-trust sites can be passed through, while low-reputation sites can be flagged for decryption and inspection. This makes C…
Question
Which statement about HTTPS decryption on the WSA is true?
Options
- ADecrypted HTTPS traffic is sent unencrypted across the enterprise intranet.
- BObject size can be used to determine whether the HTTPS traffic is to be decrypted.
- CIf WBRS is enabled, it can be used to determine whether the HTTPS traffic is to be decrypted
- DIf enabled, all HTTPS traffic must be decrypted.
How the community answered
(45 responses)- A4% (2)
- B7% (3)
- C76% (34)
- D13% (6)
Explanation
WBRS (Web-Based Reputation Score) is one of the valid policy conditions the Cisco WSA evaluates when deciding whether to decrypt HTTPS traffic - high-trust sites can be passed through, while low-reputation sites can be flagged for decryption and inspection. This makes C correct.
- A is wrong because the WSA acts as a man-in-the-middle proxy: it re-encrypts traffic toward the client using its own certificate, so decrypted content never traverses the intranet in plaintext.
- B is wrong because decryption policy decisions are driven by criteria like URL category, WBRS, user identity, and time of day - not object/file size (which applies to access policies, not decryption policies).
- D is wrong because HTTPS decryption is policy-based and selective; you can configure rules to pass through, drop, or decrypt traffic depending on conditions - it is never an all-or-nothing requirement.
Memory tip: Think "reputation decides decryption" - WBRS gives each site a trust score, and the WSA uses that score to make the decrypt/pass-through call, just like a bouncer checking IDs only for suspicious guests.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.