nerdexam
Microsoft

70-663 · Question #179

70-663 Question #179: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation

The correct answer is D. Place one file share witness in the Dallas datacenter.. Placing the file share witness in Dallas will ensure that Miami can maintain quorum if the Seattle site goes offline and vis-versa Here we have two DAG members; thus two voters. Using the formula V/2 + 1, we need at least 2 votes to maintain quorum. When the WAN connection betwee

Question

You are designing an Exchange Server 2010 environment. The environment will include three datacenters, located in Seattle, Dallas, and Miami. Each datacenter will have a separate Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) site. The Seattle and Miami datacenters will each contain two Mailbox servers. The Dallas datacenter will not contain Mailbox servers. All Mailbox servers will be members of a single database availability group (DAG). You need to recommend the minimum file share witness configuration necessary to ensure that if the Seattle datacenter fails, the DAG will continue to function. What should you recommend?

Exhibit

70-663 question #179 exhibit

Options

  • ANo file share witnesses are necessary.
  • BPlace one file share witness in the Seattle datacenter.
  • CPlace one file share witness in the Seattle datacenter and one alternate file share witness in
  • DPlace one file share witness in the Dallas datacenter.

Explanation

Placing the file share witness in Dallas will ensure that Miami can maintain quorum if the Seattle site goes offline and vis-versa Here we have two DAG members; thus two voters. Using the formula V/2 + 1, we need at least 2 votes to maintain quorum. When the WAN connection between Miami and Seattle is lost, it causes the DAG's underlying cluster to verify that it still has quorum. In this example, the DAG member in Miami is able to place an SMB lock on the witness.log file on the Witness Server in Dallas. Because the DAG member in Miami is the locking node, it gets the weighted vote, and now therefore holds the two votes necessary to retain quorum and keep its cluster and DAG functions operating. Although the DAG member in Seattle can communicate with the Witness Server in Dallas, it cannot place an SMB lock on the witness.log file because one already exists. And because it cannot communicate with the locking node, the Seattle DAG member is in the minority, it loses quorum, and it terminates its cluster and DAG functions. Remember, it doesn't matter if the other DAG members can communicate with the Witness Server; they need to be able to communicate with the locking node in order to participate in quorum and remain functional. misconceptions-addressed.aspx

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 70-663 Practice