Which statement about hot-potato routing architecture design is true?

Hot-potato routing causes a network to forward traffic out via the closest BGP exit point, minimizing internal bandwidth consumption. Content providers favor this peering model because it delivers traffic to their well-provisioned network early, and the eyeball ISP benefits by offloading internal transit cost as quickly as possible.

Keeping traffic under the network administrator's control for a longer path describes cold-potato routing, which is the opposite of hot-potato behavior.

When all ASBRs advertise the same external metric, OSPF selects the exit point based on the lowest internal IGP cost to the ASBR, which actually produces hot-potato behavior - but this statement incorrectly implies it is a special condition rather than describing the general mechanism.

Susceptibility to misconfiguration and poor inter-AS coordination is a characteristic associated with complex policy routing or confederations, not a defining property of the hot-potato routing architecture itself.