400-007 · Question #45
A service provider hires you to design its new managed CE offering to meet these requirements: - The CEs cannot run a routing protocol with the PE - Provide the ability for equal or unequal ingress…
The correct answer is D. LISP. LISP meets all stated requirements by decoupling endpoint identity from routing topology, eliminating routing protocols between CE and PE, and scaling to hundreds of thousands of sites through a centralized map-server architecture.
Question
A service provider hires you to design its new managed CE offering to meet these requirements:
- The CEs cannot run a routing protocol with the PE
- Provide the ability for equal or unequal ingress load balancing in dual-homed CE scenarios.
- Provide support for IPv6 customer routes
- Scale up to 250.000 CE devices per customer.
- Provide low operational management to scale customer growth.
- Utilize low-end (inexpensive) routing platforms for CE functionality.
Which tunneling technology do you recommend?
Options
- AFlexVPN
- Bpoint-to-point GRE
- CDMVPN
- DLISP
How the community answered
(30 responses)- A10% (3)
- B7% (2)
- C27% (8)
- D57% (17)
Why each option
LISP meets all stated requirements by decoupling endpoint identity from routing topology, eliminating routing protocols between CE and PE, and scaling to hundreds of thousands of sites through a centralized map-server architecture.
FlexVPN uses IKEv2 and typically requires a routing protocol such as BGP or EIGRP for dynamic spoke discovery, violating the no-routing-protocol-with-PE requirement and adding complexity to low-end CE platforms.
Point-to-point GRE requires a separate tunnel interface per site, making it operationally unscalable at 250,000 CEs, and it does not natively provide unequal ingress load balancing.
DMVPN relies on NHRP for dynamic spoke registration and typically runs a routing protocol between spokes and hub, which directly violates the requirement that CEs cannot run a routing protocol with the PE.
LISP separates the endpoint identifier (EID) from the routing locator (RLOC), so CE devices only need a default or static route toward the PE without running any dynamic routing protocol with it. Its map-server/map-resolver infrastructure scales to 250,000 or more sites, natively supports IPv6 EIDs, enables traffic engineering for equal and unequal load balancing through multiple RLOCs, and requires minimal CE-side configuration making low-cost platforms fully sufficient.
Concept tested: LISP for scalable managed CE without PE routing protocol
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_lisp/configuration/xe-16/irl-xe-16-book.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.