nerdexam
Cisco

400-007 · Question #388

A customer migrates from a traditional Layer 2 data center network into a new SDN-based spine- and-leaf VXLAN data center within the same location Its applications cannot be readdressed and the…

The correct answer is D. via a Layer 2 trunk to border leaf switches. A Layer 2 trunk to border leaf switches preserves existing VLANs and IP subnets during a phased VXLAN migration, allowing applications to retain their addresses without a single-cutover operation.

Designing Network Infrastructure

Question

A customer migrates from a traditional Layer 2 data center network into a new SDN-based spine- and-leaf VXLAN data center within the same location Its applications cannot be readdressed and the customer does not want to perform the migration in a single operation. How should the legacy network and new network be connected?

Options

  • Avia Layer 3 links to border leaf switches
  • Bvia a Layer 2 trunk and Layer 3 routed links to border leaf switches
  • Cvia a Layer 2 trunk and Layer 3 routed links to spine switches
  • Dvia a Layer 2 trunk to border leaf switches

How the community answered

(47 responses)
  • A
    26% (12)
  • B
    9% (4)
  • C
    13% (6)
  • D
    53% (25)

Why each option

A Layer 2 trunk to border leaf switches preserves existing VLANs and IP subnets during a phased VXLAN migration, allowing applications to retain their addresses without a single-cutover operation.

Avia Layer 3 links to border leaf switches

Layer 3 links only would impose a routing boundary between the legacy and new networks, requiring applications to be readdressed into new subnets - which the customer explicitly cannot do.

Bvia a Layer 2 trunk and Layer 3 routed links to border leaf switches

Adding Layer 3 routed links alongside the Layer 2 trunk to border leaf switches introduces unnecessary routing complexity that could force IP boundary decisions and is not required when Layer 2 extension alone satisfies the migration constraint.

Cvia a Layer 2 trunk and Layer 3 routed links to spine switches

Connecting external or legacy networks to spine switches violates the spine-and-leaf design principle - spines exist solely to interconnect leaf switches and are not the correct attachment point for outside networks or migration traffic.

Dvia a Layer 2 trunk to border leaf switchesCorrect

Border leaf switches in a spine-and-leaf VXLAN architecture are specifically designed as the attachment point for external networks and legacy environments. Extending a Layer 2 trunk from the legacy network to the border leaf preserves the original VLANs and IP subnets, so applications keep their existing IP addresses throughout the migration. This design supports a phased approach where workloads move incrementally from the legacy network into the VXLAN fabric without any readdressing.

Concept tested: VXLAN border leaf Layer 2 extension for phased migration

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus9000/sw/93x/vxlan/configuration/guide/b-cisco-nexus-9000-series-nxos-vxlan-configuration-guide-93x.html

Topics

#VXLAN#spine-leaf#SDN migration#Layer 2 trunk

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 400-007 Practice