nerdexam
Cisco

400-007 · Question #356

An engineer must redesign the QoS strategy for Company XYZ. The current network is experiencing many dropped packets due to oversubscription of the guaranteed bandwidth allocated by the service…

The correct answer is B. traffic shaping. This question tests knowledge of QoS mechanisms used to control egress traffic rates and minimize packet drops caused by exceeding service provider committed bandwidths.

Designing Network Services

Question

An engineer must redesign the QoS strategy for Company XYZ. The current network is experiencing many dropped packets due to oversubscription of the guaranteed bandwidth allocated by the service provider. Company XYZ wants a design with a QoS strategy that controls the traffic flow leaving the Edge router to minimize packet drops. Which QoS technique can be recommended as a solution?

Options

  • Apolicing
  • Btraffic shaping
  • Crate-limiting
  • DLLQ

How the community answered

(31 responses)
  • A
    13% (4)
  • B
    77% (24)
  • C
    6% (2)
  • D
    3% (1)

Why each option

This question tests knowledge of QoS mechanisms used to control egress traffic rates and minimize packet drops caused by exceeding service provider committed bandwidths.

Apolicing

Policing enforces a rate limit by dropping or re-marking packets that exceed the configured rate, which would increase packet drops rather than minimize them.

Btraffic shapingCorrect

Traffic shaping buffers packets that exceed the committed information rate (CIR) and queues them for transmission when bandwidth becomes available, rather than dropping them immediately. This smoothing behavior directly addresses the problem of oversubscription by metering outgoing traffic to match the service provider's guaranteed rate, which reduces packet drops at the provider's policing point.

Crate-limiting

Rate-limiting is conceptually equivalent to policing in this context - it enforces a hard cap by discarding excess traffic rather than buffering and smoothing it.

DLLQ

Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) prioritizes real-time traffic such as voice within the existing bandwidth but does not smooth or buffer traffic to conform to an external rate limit, so it does not prevent oversubscription-related drops.

Concept tested: Traffic shaping to minimize egress packet drops

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/quality-of-service-qos/qos-policing/19645-policevsshape.html

Topics

#QoS#traffic shaping#bandwidth management#oversubscription

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 400-007 Practice