400-007 · Question #302
If the desire is to connect virtual network functions together to accommodate different types of network service connectivity, what must be deployed?
The correct answer is C. service chaining. Service chaining links virtual network functions together in a defined sequence to deliver composite network services in NFV environments.
Question
If the desire is to connect virtual network functions together to accommodate different types of network service connectivity, what must be deployed?
Options
- Alinking
- Bbridging
- Cservice chaining
- Ddaisy chaining
- Eswitching
How the community answered
(57 responses)- A5% (3)
- B2% (1)
- C91% (52)
- E2% (1)
Why each option
Service chaining links virtual network functions together in a defined sequence to deliver composite network services in NFV environments.
Linking is not a defined NFV or SDN term for connecting VNFs together into a service delivery path.
Bridging refers to Layer 2 network connectivity and is not the term used to describe composing VNFs into a service chain.
Service chaining, also called Service Function Chaining (SFC), is the NFV technique of connecting VNFs in an ordered sequence so that traffic passes through each function - such as a virtual firewall, then a load balancer, then an IDS - to fulfill a specific service requirement. It is the standard mechanism for composing multi-function network services from individual VNFs in an NFV architecture.
Daisy chaining is an informal term for serial connections and lacks the orchestration and service-awareness that SFC provides in NFV architectures.
Switching refers to Layer 2 or Layer 3 packet forwarding and is not the mechanism for composing VNFs into a network service delivery path.
Concept tested: NFV service function chaining (SFC) for VNF composition
Source: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7665
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.