nerdexam
Cisco

400-007 · Question #100

Which undesired effect of increasing the jitter compensation buffer is true?

The correct answer is C. The overall transport delay increases and quality issues can occur. Increasing the jitter compensation buffer smooths packet arrival variance but adds latency, because packets must wait longer in the buffer before playback.

Designing Network Services

Question

Which undesired effect of increasing the jitter compensation buffer is true?

Options

  • AThe overall transport jitter decreases and quality improves.
  • BThe overall transport jitter increases and quality issues can occur.
  • CThe overall transport delay increases and quality issues can occur.
  • DThe overall transport delay decreases and quality improves.

How the community answered

(39 responses)
  • A
    5% (2)
  • B
    3% (1)
  • C
    90% (35)
  • D
    3% (1)

Why each option

Increasing the jitter compensation buffer smooths packet arrival variance but adds latency, because packets must wait longer in the buffer before playback.

AThe overall transport jitter decreases and quality improves.

The jitter buffer compensates for jitter at the receiver but does not reduce the actual jitter present in the network; transport jitter (variation in packet inter-arrival time) remains unchanged regardless of buffer size.

BThe overall transport jitter increases and quality issues can occur.

Increasing the buffer size does not cause network jitter to increase - jitter is a function of queuing and routing in the network, not of the receiver-side buffer configuration.

CThe overall transport delay increases and quality issues can occur.Correct

A jitter buffer holds arriving packets temporarily and releases them at a steady rate to compensate for variable network arrival times. Increasing the buffer depth means each packet waits longer before being forwarded to the decoder, which directly increases the end-to-end transport delay. For delay-sensitive real-time applications such as VoIP, this additional buffering delay can exceed the acceptable one-way latency threshold (typically 150 ms), causing echo, unnatural conversation gaps, and perceived quality degradation.

DThe overall transport delay decreases and quality improves.

Increasing the jitter buffer size increases end-to-end delay (not decreases it), because larger buffers impose a longer waiting period before packets are released for playback, which worsens rather than improves delay-sensitive quality.

Concept tested: Jitter buffer impact on VoIP end-to-end delay

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/voice-quality/7934-jitter-main.html

Topics

#jitter buffer#QoS#voice quality#transport delay

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 400-007 Practice