352-001 · Question #756
Which two statements about QoS marking are true? (Choose two)
The correct answer is C. QoS marking establishes a trust boundary that scheduling tools later depend on E. Class-based marking occurs after packet classification. C is correct: QoS marking (or re-marking) at trust boundaries assigns standardized values (e.g., DSCP, CoS) that downstream QoS mechanisms-queuing, scheduling, policing-rely on to make forwarding decisions. Without consistent, trusted markings, scheduling tools cannot correctly…
Question
Which two statements about QoS marking are true? (Choose two)
Options
- AShaping is one of the ways that packets can be remarked.
- B802.1Q/p CoS bits and IP Precedence are Layer 3 marking fields.
- CQoS marking establishes a trust boundary that scheduling tools later depend on
- DMPLS EXP and DSCP are Layer 2 marking fields
- EClass-based marking occurs after packet classification
How the community answered
(20 responses)- A5% (1)
- C95% (19)
Explanation
C is correct: QoS marking (or re-marking) at trust boundaries assigns standardized values (e.g., DSCP, CoS) that downstream QoS mechanisms-queuing, scheduling, policing-rely on to make forwarding decisions. Without consistent, trusted markings, scheduling tools cannot correctly differentiate traffic classes. E is correct: class-based marking is a two-step process-packets must first be classified (matched against ACLs, NBAR, or other criteria) before a marking action can be applied. Classification always precedes marking. The other options are incorrect: A is wrong because shaping buffers/delays traffic to enforce a rate; it does not remark packets. B is wrong because 802.1Q/p CoS bits are a Layer 2 field (Ethernet frame header), not Layer 3-only IP Precedence is Layer 3. D is wrong because DSCP is a Layer 3 field (IP header), while MPLS EXP (now called TC bits) operates at Layer 2.5 in the MPLS label stack, not strictly Layer 2.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.