350-501 · Question #624
What is the purpose of OSPF-TE extensions to MPLS traffic engineering functionality?
The correct answer is C. calculating and establishing TE tunnels in accordance with network constraints. OSPF-TE extensions provide the necessary information to calculate and establish Traffic Engineering (TE) tunnels based on network constraints.
Question
What is the purpose of OSPF-TE extensions to MPLS traffic engineering functionality?
Options
- Acarrying OSPF routing information for TE tunnels
- Badvertising the TE tunnel routes to the OSPF domain
- Ccalculating and establishing TE tunnels in accordance with network constraints
- Dcalculating fast reroute to provide a backup path for TE tunnels
How the community answered
(25 responses)- A8% (2)
- C88% (22)
- D4% (1)
Why each option
OSPF-TE extensions provide the necessary information to calculate and establish Traffic Engineering (TE) tunnels based on network constraints.
While OSPF-TE provides routing information, its specific purpose is not just carrying OSPF routing information, but rather *extended* TE-specific information.
Advertising TE tunnel routes to the OSPF domain is a function of BGP or other routing protocols interacting with the tunnels, not the primary purpose of OSPF-TE extensions themselves.
OSPF-TE extensions advertise additional link attributes, such as available bandwidth, link colors, and administrative groups, beyond standard routing metrics. This information is crucial for path computation engines to select optimal paths for TE tunnels that meet specific service requirements and network constraints.
Calculating fast reroute is a separate function that leverages the information provided by OSPF-TE, but OSPF-TE's core purpose is providing the data for the initial path calculation and establishment.
Concept tested: OSPF-TE extensions purpose
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_te_path_options/configuration/xe-16/mp-te-path-options-xe-16-book/mte-ospf-isis-support.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.