nerdexam
Cisco

350-501 · Question #398

Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer with an employee ID 4402:98:032 is setting up an IS-IS network with these requirements: - Routes with a tag of 80 and IP prefixes other than 192.168.10.20/24 m

The correct answer is D. Add match ip address 152 in route-map redist1-2. The IS-IS network requires redistribution from Level 1 to Level 2 for routes tagged 80, excluding 192.168.10.20/24, and route leaking from Level 2 to Level 1 for routes tagged 50 or 40. To meet the exclusion requirement for L1 to L2 redistribution, a route-map (redist1-2) must be

Networking

Question

Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer with an employee ID 4402:98:032 is setting up an IS-IS network with these requirements:

  • Routes with a tag of 80 and IP prefixes other than 192.168.10.20/24

must be redistributed from Level 1 into Level 2

  • Route leaking must be configured from Level 2 into the Level 1 domain

for routes that are tagged with only 50 or 40 Which configuration must be implemented on RB to meet the requirements?

Exhibit

350-501 question #398 exhibit

Options

  • ARemove match tag 40 from route-map leak2-1
  • BAdd match tag 80 in route-map leak2-1
  • CChange match tag 80 to match tag 50 in route-map redist1-2
  • DAdd match ip address 152 in route-map redist1-2

How the community answered

(37 responses)
  • A
    14% (5)
  • B
    8% (3)
  • C
    22% (8)
  • D
    57% (21)

Why each option

The IS-IS network requires redistribution from Level 1 to Level 2 for routes tagged 80, excluding 192.168.10.20/24, and route leaking from Level 2 to Level 1 for routes tagged 50 or 40. To meet the exclusion requirement for L1 to L2 redistribution, a route-map (`redist1-2`) must be configured to match an IP access-list that permits all IP prefixes except 192.168.10.20/24.

ARemove match tag 40 from route-map leak2-1

Removing `match tag 40` from `route-map leak2-1` would prevent routes tagged 40 from being leaked from L2 to L1, which violates the requirement to leak routes tagged with 50 or 40.

BAdd match tag 80 in route-map leak2-1

Adding `match tag 80` to `route-map leak2-1` would leak routes tagged 80 from L2 to L1, which is not part of the specified L2 to L1 leaking requirements (tags 50 or 40).

CChange match tag 80 to match tag 50 in route-map redist1-2

Changing `match tag 80` to `match tag 50` in `route-map redist1-2` would prevent routes tagged 80 from being redistributed from L1 to L2, violating the first requirement.

DAdd match ip address 152 in route-map redist1-2Correct

The first requirement states that routes with a tag of 80 and IP prefixes other than 192.168.10.20/24 must be redistributed from Level 1 into Level 2 via route-map `redist1-2`. Adding `match ip address 152` to `redist1-2` allows the router to filter routes based on an access list (presumably 152), which would be configured to permit all IP prefixes except 192.168.10.20/24.

Concept tested: IS-IS redistribution with route-maps and access-lists

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_isis/configuration/xe-3s/irs-xe-3s-book/irs-redistribute.html

Topics

#IS-IS#Route Redistribution#Route Leaking#Route-maps

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 350-501 Practice